Delegation not Capitulation
Many struggle with Effective Delegation. A common misunderstanding is that delegating is a capitulation over the control of an outcome – “give it away and forget it.” Why do some master delegation while others are afraid of it or frustrated with it? The answer starts with self-awareness.
While there are many personality types, there are two common flawed perspectives on the idea of delegating from two entirely different mind-sets: the Defender and the Pretender.
The Defender is a high-order and detail-oriented person for whom delegation can feel like giving away control. He does the task better than most, so “why bother?” His experience in delegating has resulted in failure to meet dates or a poor level of quality.
The Pretender is a big picture guy for whom delegation is a way of life. He surrounds himself with strong people “that are just expected to execute.” He may have had mixed success with this approach but feels emotionally disconnected from the process and divested of the subordinate.
The Defender frequently hears, “Joe, you just need to learn how to delegate more.” To Joe, this is a value judgement creating fear, and the pressure to give up control. His ability to control has made his career as successful as it is today, making delegation a personal threat. The Pretender, conversely, has no fear but doesn’t understand how his ineffective delegation impacts results. He does a poor job providing details and clarity on the task.
Each mind-set could be improved with self-reflection even though they have vastly different starting points. For the Defender proper delegation can actually increase his control through frequent touch points and teaching moments. In the case of the Pretender more appropriate delegation will start with teaching and confirming subordinate understanding of the task thus remaining part of the equation. This is done through clarification, patience, and following through.
BOTH mind-sets get the advantage of a multiplier effect of themselves by teaching another to perform the task, thereby increasing the capacity of the overall organization. You may be surprised to find that the subordinate did the task more creatively, thoroughly, or effectively.
The paradigm shift is in treating delegation as a teaching moment. The entire process is a mechanism for managing delegated tasks, creating a cadence of accountability, mentoring, and ultimately successful growth for the organization.
Regardless of which type of person you are, a good delegation process will help the Defender “feel comfortable” with letting go, and the Pretender “feel confident” that he has the right players on the team. Avoid the frustration that comes from capitulation.
Ask yourself this question, “Why am I not delegating at all or why is my success substandard?” Then, pause, and take a look into the mirror for your answer.
While there are many personality types, there are two common flawed perspectives on the idea of delegating from two entirely different mind-sets: the Defender and the Pretender.
The Defender is a high-order and detail-oriented person for whom delegation can feel like giving away control. He does the task better than most, so “why bother?” His experience in delegating has resulted in failure to meet dates or a poor level of quality.
The Pretender is a big picture guy for whom delegation is a way of life. He surrounds himself with strong people “that are just expected to execute.” He may have had mixed success with this approach but feels emotionally disconnected from the process and divested of the subordinate.
The Defender frequently hears, “Joe, you just need to learn how to delegate more.” To Joe, this is a value judgement creating fear, and the pressure to give up control. His ability to control has made his career as successful as it is today, making delegation a personal threat. The Pretender, conversely, has no fear but doesn’t understand how his ineffective delegation impacts results. He does a poor job providing details and clarity on the task.
Each mind-set could be improved with self-reflection even though they have vastly different starting points. For the Defender proper delegation can actually increase his control through frequent touch points and teaching moments. In the case of the Pretender more appropriate delegation will start with teaching and confirming subordinate understanding of the task thus remaining part of the equation. This is done through clarification, patience, and following through.
BOTH mind-sets get the advantage of a multiplier effect of themselves by teaching another to perform the task, thereby increasing the capacity of the overall organization. You may be surprised to find that the subordinate did the task more creatively, thoroughly, or effectively.
The paradigm shift is in treating delegation as a teaching moment. The entire process is a mechanism for managing delegated tasks, creating a cadence of accountability, mentoring, and ultimately successful growth for the organization.
Regardless of which type of person you are, a good delegation process will help the Defender “feel comfortable” with letting go, and the Pretender “feel confident” that he has the right players on the team. Avoid the frustration that comes from capitulation.
Ask yourself this question, “Why am I not delegating at all or why is my success substandard?” Then, pause, and take a look into the mirror for your answer.
Comments
Post a Comment